The single-judge court disposed of contempt proceedings against the respondent. After finding that directions issued earlier were complied with via a speaking order accepting the petitioner's claim, the court discharged the rule and dropped the proceedings.
Rule discharged and contempt proceedings dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2130 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: February 09, 2012
Paramveer Kaur
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Hussan Lal
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PRESENT: - Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.S. Cheema, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
to decide the legal notice served on behalf of the petitioner is said
to have been complied with and a speaking order dated 8.2.2012
COCP No.2130 of 2011 [2]
(Annexure R-1) has been passed accepting the petitioner's claim, leaving no cause to continue with these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
Paramveer Kaur
Hussan Lal
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
