Single judge contempt proceedings were disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the rule after the disposal of the appealed order. Not reported.
Rule discharged with liberty to seek revival after disposal of LPA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 2474 of 2011 . [O&M] Date of Decision: 8th February, 2012 .
Jagdish Lal Sharma
Petitioner through Mr. Ishwar Lal, Advocate
Versus
K.D.Chaudhary Respondent through Ms. Neha Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL]
Reply/affidavit has been filed by the respondent pointing
out that the LPA Bench has stayed the operation of the order dated 01.03.2011.
These contempt proceedings are disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to seek their revival after the disposal of the Letters Patent Appeal, if so required.
Rule discharged.
Disposed of. Dasti .
February 08, 2012. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE
Jagdish Lal Sharma
K.D. Chaudhary
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
