In this contempt proceeding, a reply affidavit was filed by Respondent No.4 offering the petitioner an appointment. The court found no cause to continue the proceedings and dropped them.
Contempt proceedings dropped; the petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.178 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 23, 2012
Lal Singh
..... Petitioner
versus Sh.S.C.Aggarwal, Chief Secretary and others ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
-.-
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Respondent No.4 has filed reply-affidavit alongwith a copy of the appointment letter dated 21.2.2012 offering appointment to the petitioner as Class-IV employee.
In this view of the matter, there is no cause to continue with
these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
The contempt petition stands disposed of.
February 23, 2012 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE
Lal Singh
Sh.S.C.Aggarwal
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
