Petition challenging non-reinstatement and non-payment of backwages dismissed as irrelevant after establishment of full compliance with court directions.
Contempt petition disposed of; petitioner directed to seek disposal of any other pending claim from competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1454 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.02.2012
Bhoop Singh
vs.
BK Garg, Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Sohna & Anr. . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. PL Verma, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. MC Berry, Addl. AG Punjab
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
COCP No.1454 of 2011.doc
22.02.2012 vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be disposed of following compliance with reinstatement and backwages directions.
Whether pending claims should be escalated to competent authority.
Bhoop Singh
BK Garg
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
