In this contempt proceedings, the respondent submitted that court directions were complied with and the petitioner's services were regularized. The court dropped the proceedings.
Rule discharged; contempt proceedings dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1667 of 2011
Date of Decision: February 14, 2012
Dharam Pal
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Jyoti Arora, IAS, Managing Director, Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited, Shakti Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Panchal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate, for the respondent.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
issued by this Court have been complied with and services of the petitioner have been regularised, leaving no cause to continue with these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
COCP No.1667 of 2011 [2]
(Surya Kant)
Dharam Pal
Jyoti Arora, IAS and Another
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
