Contempt proceedings were dropped after the respondent confirmed refund of the recovered amount to the petitioner in compliance with court orders. Rule discharged.
The contempt proceedings were dropped and the rule was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 1338 of 2012. [O&M] Date of Decision: 21st May, 2012.
Sham Lal
Petitioner through Mr. Deepak Nayyar, Advocate
Versus
Ajay Kumar & Another Respondents through Mr. B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL]
Mr. B.S.Chahal, learned Deputy Advocate General,
Punjab, on instructions states that the recovered amount has been refunded to the petitioner in compliance to the Court orders. He has also placed on record a copy of the receipt, leaving no cause to continue with these contempt proceedings, which are accordingly dropped.
Rule discharged.
Disposed of. Dasti .
May 21, 2012. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE
Sham Lal
Ajay Kumar
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
