Disposal of contempt petition where respondent entitlement under policy is acknowledged without merits determination, leaving open right to approach appropriate forum.
Contempt petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to impugn before appropriate forum if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.1008 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision : May 04, 2012
Sanjay Kumar
.....Petitioner
versus
Dr.G.Vajralingam and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Cheema, Senior DAG, Punjab.
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Reply-affidavit filed in Court by respondent No.4 is taken on
record.
In view of the categoric stand taken by the respondents, the petitioner is entitled to appointment under the Policy.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue in question, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the same before an appropriate forum, if so advised.
Dasti.
May 04, 2012 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE
Sanjay Kumar
Dr.G.Vajralingam and others
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
