In this writ petition, the High Court dismissed the challenge against the non-grant of ACP/Proficiency Step-up due to the Supreme Court's authoritative decision equating such services with regular ones.
Writ petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9917 of 1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.09.2011
Gurmej Singh & Ors.
VS.
State of Punjab & Ors.
. . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. JS Maanipur, Advocate for the petitioners
Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
The question involved in this writ petition as to “whether the work-charged service can be treated at par with the regular service for the purpose of grant of ACP/Proficiency Step-up” has been authoritatively dealt with against the petitioner by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Punjab State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Jagjiwan Ram and Ors. (2009) 3 SCC 661 .
Following the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Punjab State Electricity Board’s case (supra), the writ petition stands dismissed.
(S u r y a K a n t) Judge
20.09.2011 vishal shonkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether work-charged service can be treated at par with regular service for the grant of ACP/Proficiency Step-up.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Punjab State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Jagjiwan Ram and Ors.Followed¶19
Punjab State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Jagjiwan Ram and Ors. (2009) 3 SCC 661 · Who else cites this
Gurmej Singh & Ors.
State of Punjab & Ors.
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
