The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for counting daily wager service towards regular service for pension benefits. The court allowed the writ relying on a Division Bench judgment in Mukhtiar Singh's case.
Directing the respondents to count the petitioner's daily wager service along with regular service for pension benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 11817 of 2005 Date of Decision: 19.09.2011
Harphool Chand
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Present : Mr. S.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondents.
SURYA KANT, J.(Oral)
Petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the respondents to count the service rendered by him as daily wager along with the regular service as qualify service for the purpose of granting him the benefit of pension and other retiral benefits.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands answered in favour of the petitioner by a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 19.04.2011 passed in L.P.A. No. 189 of 2004 (State of Punjab and others V. Mukhtiar Singh).
The writ petition is allowed in terms of Mukhtiar Singh's
case (supra).
Dasti.
19.09.2011
(SURYA KANT) JUDGE
' ravinder'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to count daily wager service along with regular service for pension benefits?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mukhtiar SinghReferred¶14
L.P.A. No. 189 of 2004 (State of Punjab V. Mukhtiar Singh)
Harphool Chand
State of Punjab
SURYA KANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
