The writ court held that the petition challenging acquisition proceedings filed after notification under Section 4 and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act was premature as no declaration had been issued. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
Writ petition declared premature and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.6268 of 2011 Date of decision: 07.04.2011
Sham Lal and others
…..Petitioners
versus
The State of Punjab others
……Respondents
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg
Present: Mr.Kapil Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners
Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)
In this case, challenge is to the acquisition proceedings. Admittedly, after issuance of a notification under Section 4 read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 23.11.2010, declaration has not yet been issued. In view of that the present writ petition is premature.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Jasbir Singh) Judge
07.04.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging acquisition proceedings is maintainable before the declaration has been issued.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sham Lal and others
The State of Punjab others
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
