Petitioners failed to appear on the date of hearing. The High Court dismissed the writ petition in default after noting the absence of counsel representing the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4054 OF 1990 DATE OF DECISION: April 7, 2011.
Parties Name
Sat Narain Kaushik and others
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Haryana and others
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg
PRESENT: None for the petitioners
Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Haryana;
Jasbir Singh, J. (oral)
Order.
None appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing, i.e., March 21, 2011, and the matter was adjourned to today. Even today position is no different. Dismissed in default.
Registry is directed to send copy of this order to petitioner
No.1.
( Jasbir Singh ) Judge
(Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge
April 7, 2011. DKC
Sat Narain Kaushik and others
The State of Haryana and others
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
