Writ petition dismissed as prayed for having become infructuous. No substantive ruling or legal principle is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 513 of 2011 Date of decision : 04.11.2011
Sarbjeet Kaur
...Petitioner
versus
The State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P.S. Sidhu, Asstt., A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for respondent Nos. 7, 9, 10 and 13.
Respondent Nos. 9, 12 and 14 ex parte.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that since the instant writ petition has become infructuous, so, the same may be dismissed as such.
Learned counsel for respondents did not raise any objection, in this relevant connection.
In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for.
November 04, 2011 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Sarbjeet Kaur
The State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
