In an oral order, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana waived the earlier imposed cost and dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after Learned State counsel submitted that necessary relief was already granted to the petitioner.
Cost imposed earlier stood waived off; matter treated as infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.4708 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.02.2011
Mahavir Goel
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***
MAHESH GROVER, J. (Oral)
CM No.1648 of 2011
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the cost which has been imposed earlier, stand waived off.
The application stands allowed.
Main case
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the case has been called out twice.
Learned State counsel has submitted that the necessary relief has been granted to the petitioner and this petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Ordered accordingly.
February 03, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) sonia Judge
Mahavir Goel
State of Haryana and others
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
