Petitioner's CWP dismissed for want of prosecution as no instructions were furnished and no representation was present on his behalf on the decided date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14149 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : 03 -02-2011
Vikas Kumar
....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present:Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana
Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. S.D.Yadav, Advocate for respondent no.3.
MAHESH GROVER, J
Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate who has filed the instant petition
on behalf of the petitioner pleads no instructions and states that the brief has
been taken away by the petitioner from her.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
February 3 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge
Vikas Kumar
State of Haryana
MAHESH GROVER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
