The writ petition was declared infructuous because the petitioner was not a successful candidate in the draw of lots held on 14.12.2010, rendering relief unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.20185 of 2010 Date of Decision:- 26.05.2011
Brig. Manmohan Singh
....Petitioner(s)
vs.
GMADA and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present:Ms.Seema Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.H.S.Brar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.3.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
Reply on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 filed in Court today and is taken on record, a copy whereof has been given to counsel for the petitioner.
Counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 states that the name of the petitioner was included in the draw of lots held on 14.12.2010 but he was not one of the successful candidates and, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
May 26, 2011 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE
Brig. Manmohan Singh
GMADA
others
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
