Petitioner sought subsidy superseded by State per industrial policy. Court allowed petition relying on connected matter (CWP No.19007 of 2002) where identical issue decided for petitioner.
Writ petition allowed in terms of the judgment in CWP No.19007 of 2002 (M/s. Balak Gases Oxygen Gas Plant and another v. State of Punjab & Ors.).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.18770 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.08.2011
M/s. Punj Brother Ltd.
VS.
State of Punjab & Ors.
. . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. JS Toor, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. BS Chahal, DAG Punjab
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
CWP No.18770 of 2006.doc
(4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti .
10.08.2011 (S u r y a K a n t) vishal shonkar Judge
2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s. Balak Gases Oxygen Gas Plant and another v. State of Punjab & Ors.Followed¶20
CWP No.19007 of 2022 (M/s. Balak Gases Oxygen Gas Plant and another v. State of Punjab & Ors.)
M/s. Punj Brother Ltd.
State of Punjab
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
