Petitioner filed a writ petition. A prior order dated 10.1.2011 granted the petitioner's claim, rendering the instant petition infructuous. The court dismissed the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.15231 of 2010
Date of decision : 21.2.2011
Purshotam Dass
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr.Ravinder Malik Ravi, Advocate for Mr.B.K.Bagri Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the respondents.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
A copy of order dated 10.1.2011 has been placed on record which indicates that the claim made herein has been granted to the petitioner. Consequently, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. .
21.2.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
dss
Purshotam Dass
State of Haryana
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
