State counsell reported the cancellation of the transfer orders of the petitioners. The Court held the writ petition infructuous as the specific grievance was resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.11706 of 2010
Date of decision : 10.2.2011
EASI Rajmal & others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr. Amit Khatkar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the State.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
Learned counsel for the State has produced a communication which reveals that the transfer orders of the petitioners have been cancelled, and since this was the only grievance which was made in the petition, the same has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as having become infructuous.
10.2.2011 (MAHESH GROVER)
JUDGE
dss
EASI Rajmal & others
State of Haryana
MAHESH GROVER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
