Petitioners challenged orders dated 30.9.1992 and 29.4.1993 via Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. The single-judge bench found the impugned orders reasonable and well-founded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 11682 of 1993
Date of decision: July 08, 2011
Bikkar Singh and another
.. Petitioners
Vs.
The superintendent Canal Officer, Sirhind Canal Circle Ludhiana and another
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.C. Goel, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
A.N. Jindal, J
The petitioners has invoked the provisions of Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing in the nature of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 30.9.1992 (Annexure P2) and 29.4.1993 (Annexure P3).
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and going through the impugned orders, the same appear to be quite reasonable and well founded.
No grounds to interfere.
Dismissed.
July 08, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Bikkar Singh and another
The superintendent Canal Officer, Sirhind Canal Circle Ludhiana and another
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
