The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 10609 of 1993
Date of decision: July 08, 2011
Vidya alias Radha Devi
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab Chandigarh and another
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Goel, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
A.N. Jindal, J
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the case any further.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
July 08, 2011 deepak
(A.N. Jindal) Judge
Vidya alias Radha Devi
Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab Chandigarh
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
