Kamaljeet Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Challenging the State's demand for royalty, this Court held that since brick earth was not specifically vested in the State and prior precedent established a rebuttable presumption against state vesting, the State had no right to claim royalty. The impugned order demanding royalty was set aside.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order dated 20.5.1992 demanding royalty is set aside.