Petitioner’s criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed as infructuous due to trial court acquittal during pendency of this petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-7743 of 2011 Date of decision : 24.5.2011
Santosh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned State counsel at the outset submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial court during pendency of this petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert this factual contention.
In view of above, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 24.5.2011 'rajpal'
Santosh
State of Haryana
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
