Petitioner requested withdrawal of Crl. Misc. No. M-11451 of 2011. The High Court, relying on the counsel's statement, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-11451 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.5.2011
Surinder Pal Singh @ Sodi
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be allowed to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
23.5.2011 'rajpal'
Surinder Pal Singh @ Sodi
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
