Petitioners withdrew the present criminal miscellaneous petition at the threshold, leaving no cause of action. Hence, the judge dismissed the petition on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. 55970-M of 2006 Date of decision : 17.08.2011
Baljit Singh and others
....Petitioners
V/s
State of Haryana and another
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Amit Kaushik, Sr. DAG Haryana.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
instructions to withdraw this petition as no cause of action survives in it.
In view of above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
August 17, 2011
(RAJAN GUPTA)
Ajay JUDGE
Baljit Singh and others
State of Haryana and another
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
