Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court granted bail noting co-accused were acquitted and witnesses did not support prosecution, relying on prosecution being incomplete. No risk of absconding alleged.
Regular bail granted to petitioner at the satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate, Palwal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.No.M-34505 of 2010(O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-34505 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: February 7, 2011
Safi
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Indersh Goel, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
-2-
Crl.M.No.M-34505 of 2010(O&M)
7.2.2011
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the case against him being meritorious and pending trial?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Safi
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
