Harbans Singh @ Sohni v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
In this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the court considered a petition filed for anticipatory bail where the petitioner had already joined the investigation. While an interim order existed, the court made the interim bail absolute subject to the same conditions.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 17.11.2011 granting interim bail is made absolute subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M- 31041 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: December 15, 2011
Harbans Singh @ Sohni
---Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
---Respondent
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Mr.G.S.Punia, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. A.S.Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab
Gurdev Singh, J.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim anticipatory bail allowed vide order dated 17.11.2011 should be made absolute given the petitioner joined the investigation.
Whether the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. should continue to apply to make the bail absolute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harbans Singh @ Sohni
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Gurdev Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/31041/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court