Dismissed
Paramjot Kaur and Anr. v. Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/27030/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Criminal Misc. No.27030 -M of 2011 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 12, 2011
PARAMJOT KAUR & ANR.
....... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS.
.... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Mor, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate, for respondents 3 & 4.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)
The petitioners have approached this court with a plea that they got married, however, against the desires of respondents No.3 and 4, who are father and mother of petitioner No.1 and, therefore, are being threatened.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 has pointed out that respondents No.3 and 4 are aged persons and at no point in time did they threaten the petitioners. Rather, the family circumstances are demanding and they are only worried about the welfare of their daughter.
In view of the statement given by learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4, no ground for issuance of any direction is made out.
The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 12, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE
PARAMJOT KAUR & ANR.
U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS.
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court