Dismissed
Surinder Kumar Kapur and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/17347/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
<null>
What did the court decide?
<null>
What the court decided
AI extract
<null>
<null>
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Criminal Misc. No.17347 -M of 2010 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 12, 2011
SURENDER KUMAR KAPUR & ANR.
....... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
.... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the
petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous on the statement of learned
counsel for the petitioners.
September 12, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE
SURENDER KUMAR KAPUR & ANR.
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court