The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if the prosecution witness PW Ramal adopts an evasive approach within three months.
Liberty to file a fresh petition if the prosecution witness adopts an evasive approach within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc-No. M-22185 of 2011 Date of Decision: 07 November,2011
Krishana
Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI
Present: :-Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG Haryana.
M.M.S.BEDI, J.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file
a fresh petition after PW Ramal, is examined.
It is made clear that if the prosecution witness adopts evasive approach to appear in the Court within a period of three
months, it is open to the petitioner to approach this Court again.
Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
7.11.2011 aarti
Krishana
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
