In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner alleged that respondents took his vehicle without payment. The single-judge bench held it was not a fit case for issuing directions to the police and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.21281 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 03, 2011
Virender Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The only allegation made in the petition is that respondents have taken away the vehicle of the petitioner without making any payment. In my view, it is not a fit case for issuing any direction to the police.
Dismissed.
October 03, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should issue directions to the police regarding the petitioner's vehicle.
Virender Singh
State of Haryana & others
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
