Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-1925 of 2011 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-1925 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.4.2011
Barinderjit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vikas Behl, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition.
The prayer for withdrawal is not opposed by the learned
State counsel.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
21.4.2011 'rajpal'
Barinderjit Singh
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
