Petition declared infructuous by single judge on oral hearing.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18370-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:09.08.2011.
Mam Chand and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr. S.K.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate, for the complainant.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
August 09, 2011 vinod*
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
Mam Chand and another
State of Haryana
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
