Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to invoke judicial inquiry under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach Court under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-16109 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 26.05.2011
Pawan Kumar
..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..........Respondents
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail an alternative remedy under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty.
May 26, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan Kumar
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
