Dismissed
Salamat Alias Bitta Masih v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/13661/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl.…
What the court decided
AI extract
AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-13661 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 22.7.2011
Salamat alias Bitta Masih
..Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Punjab
..Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present : Mr. Kulwinder Singh Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek Chautala, AAG Punjab.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that entire prosecution evidence has already been led and now the case is fixed for defence evidence.
Considering the stage of trial, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail at this stage.
Dismissed.
( Rajesh Bindal ) 22.7.2011 Judge Meenu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted at the stage of defence evidence.
Salamat alias Bitta Masih
State of Punjab
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court