The petitioner argued that the present petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13583 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.08.2011
Amandeep Singh . . .Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab . . . Respondent ******* CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ******* Present: Mr.KDS Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infrustuous.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 19, 2011 JUDGE Vivek
Amandeep Singh
The State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
