The Single Judge in an oral order disposed of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by accepting the State counsel's assurance to review representations without passing further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-13213 of 2011 Date of decision : 22.07.2011
Amar Chand
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to official respondents not to harass petitioner or his family members.
At the outset, learned State counsel submits that in case any representation is received from the petitioner and there is any substance in the same, the same shall be looked into by respondent No. 2.
In view of statement made by learned State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed.
Disposed of.
July 22, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Chand
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
