Criminal reference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking protection of life and liberty due to marriage against family wishes. Court stated no further orders are required if representation is received from petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-12347 of 2011 Date of decision : 22.07.2011
Mahenderi Dagar and another
....Petitioners
V/s
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sidharth Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Mahender Tewatia, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that a direction be issued to official respondents to protect life and liberty of the petitioners as they have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 6.
Learned State counsel submits that in case any representation is received from the petitioners, the same shall be looked into by respondent No. 2 and appropriate steps shall be taken, if circumstances so warrant.
In view of above, no further orders are required to be passed.
Disposed of.
July 22, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are required to protect life and liberty regarding marriage against wishes of family members.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahenderi Dagar
State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
