The single-judge bench declined to grant bail in an adjourned criminal matter at the stage where prosecution evidence was concluded and accused statements recorded, dismissing the plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-13058 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.7.2011
Malkiat Singh
.. Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
.. Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Ms. Malkiat Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
In terms of the report received from the Court below wherein it is mentioned that the prosecution evidence was concluded on 23.2.2011, the statements of the accused were recorded on 9.3.2011 and thereafter, the case is being adjourned on the request of counsel for the accused, I do not find any reason to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
Dismissed.
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
12.7.2011
reena
Malkiat Singh
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
