The petitioner, having failed to persuade the Court, withdrew the present petition. The Court dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-12844 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: 04.08.2011
Balo Ram @ Lala
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN.
Present: Mr.P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner
found that he could not persuade the Court and prays for withdrawal of the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
August 04, 2011 sukhpreet
Balo Ram @ Lala
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
