This single-judge oral order dismissed a petition seeking quashing of a Domestic Violence complaint under Section 12 of the 2005 Act on a directive report that the parties had compromised and the respondent's wife had withdrawn the complaint.
None. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-12178 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.10.2011.
Sandeep Dhingra and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH
Present:
Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Bhullar, A.A.G., Punjab, for respondent No.1 – State.
Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)
By filing this petition, petitioners seek quashing of complaint titled-'Ashu Dhingra versus Sandeep Dhingra and others' (Annexure P-3) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amritsar.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has stated that the parties have compromised the matter and are residing together. Ashu Dhingra-respondent No.2 has already withdrawn the complaint filed against the petitioners.
In view of this, present petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
14.10.2011 neetu
(NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Dhingra and another
State of Punjab
Ashu Dhingra
NAWAB SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
