The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition as infructuous after the main ejectment petition was allowed, rendering the challenge to the interim order on provisional rent moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.5192 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:13.01.2011.
Ved Parkash
...Petitioner
Versus
Wazir Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Khatkar, Advocate, for the respondent. *****
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
This revision petition has been filed against the interim order passed by the learned Rent Controller on fixation of provisional rent of the demised premises. Since the main ejectment petition has now been allowed by the learned Rent Controller, therefore, the present revision petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
January 13, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE
Ved Parkash
Wazir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
