Revenue challenged VAT Tribunal order via appeal covered by a prior Court order dated 10.1.2011 in VAT Appeal No.67 of 2010; present appeal dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
VATAP No.68 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.1.2011
State of Punjab & another.
-----Appellants.
Vs.
M/s V.S. Traders.
-----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab for the appellants.
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 68(2) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short, “the Act”) against the order of the VAT Tribunal, Punjab in Appeal (VAT) No.15 of 2010 proposing to raise following substantial questions of law:-
VATAP No.68 of 2010
2
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly states that the matter is covered against the appellants by order of this Court dated 10.1.2011 in the case of the assessee in VAT Appeal No.67 of 2010
State of Punjab & another v. M/s V.S. Traders.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE January 12, 2011 ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) ashwani JUDGE
State of Punjab
M/s V.S. Traders
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Ajay Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
