Single judge civil revision petition assailing dismissal of an application moved by the petitioner. The High Court found the trial court took the right view and dismissed the revision, leaving the court fee question open.
Revision petition dismissed. Court fee question left open to trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1833 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of decision: March 23, 2011
Sarabjeet Singh
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Pritam Kaur and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J (Oral)
This petition assails the order dated 8.2.2011 (Annexure P4) passed by the trial court whereby the application moved by the petitionerdefendant was dismissed.
Having scrutinized the impugned order and gone through the record of the case, the trial court appears to have taken right view of the matter.
No grounds to interfere.
Dismissed.
However, the question of court fee is left open to be decided by the trial court on merits.
March 23, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court correctly dismissed the petitioner's application.
Sarabjeet Singh
Pritam Kaur and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
