law of Mam Chand's brother. Defendants also examined Khem Chand DW3 and Kurda Ram DW4. All of them have stated that Kalawati was not daughter of Mam Chand. Similar statements have been made by Man Singh DW6 and Dharam Chand DW5. Thus, defendants have led evidence to the effect that Kalawati was not daughter of Mam Chand. After appreciating and analysing evidence led by the parties, both the courts below have come to concurrent finding that Kalawati was not daughter of Mam Chand. The said finding is based on appreciation of evidence on record and cannot be said to be perverse or illegal so as to warrant interference in second appeal. Cogent reasons have been assigned by courts below for arriving at the said finding. Lower appellate court is final court of fact. The question whether Kalawati was or was not daughter of Mam Chand is a pure question of fact. Accordingly, no question of law much less substantial question of law arises for determination in the instant second appeal. This Court is not supposed to appreciate the evidence again while deciding second appeal, but even on appreciation of evidence by this Court, it is found that the finding recorded by the courts below that Kalawati was not daughter of Mam Chand is fully justified by the evidence on record.
