The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition filed after an award was passed in 2009, relying on Supreme Court ratios regarding the limitation for filing such petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.15121 of 2010 Date of decision: 24.8.2010
M/s Bringly Properties Pvt. Ltd. and others
…..Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
……Respondents
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih
Present: Mr.Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioners
Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)
As per information supplied by counsel for the petitioner, at the time of arguments, award in this case was passed in the year 2009. This writ petition having been filed after passing of the award possibly cannot be entertained in view of ratio of judgments in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Industrial Development and Investment Company (P) Limited, (1996) 11 SCC 501; Municipal Council, Ahmednagar v. Shah Hyder Beig, (2000) 2 SCC 48; C. Padma v. Deputy Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, (1997) 2 SCC 627; Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of Haryana, (1996) 11 SCC 698; and M/s Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, JT 2008 (2) SC 280 Swaran Lata etc. v. State of Haryana and others AIR 2010 Supreme Court 1664.
In view of above, the writ petition stands dismissed.
(Jasbir Singh) Judge
24.08.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed after the award has been passed in industrial disputes is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Industrial Development and Investment Company (P) LimitedReferred¶11
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Industrial Development and Investment Company (P) Limited, (1996) 11 SCC 501 · Who else cites this
Municipal Council, Ahmednagar v. Shah Hyder BeigReferred¶11
Municipal Council, Ahmednagar v. Shah Hyder Beig, (2000) 2 SCC 48 · Who else cites this
C. Padma v. Deputy Secretary to the Government of Tamil NaduReferred¶11
C. Padma v. Deputy Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, (1997) 2 SCC 627 · Who else cites this
Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of HaryanaReferred¶11
Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of Haryana, (1996) 11 SCC 698 · Who else cites this
M/s Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of RajasthanReferred¶11
M/s Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, JT 2008 (2) SC 280 · Who else cites this
Swaran Lata etc. v. State of Haryana and othersReferred¶11
Swaran Lata etc. v. State of Haryana and others AIR 2010 Supreme Court 1664 · Who else cites this
M/s Bringly Properties Pvt. Ltd. and others
State of Haryana and others
Jasbir Singh
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
