Bench passed ex-parte order referring parties to a detailed reasons recorded in a separate order titled State of Haryana and another Versus Amriti and others.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 994 of 2002 (O&M)
State of Haryana
....... Appellant
Versus
Smt. Bhanwa Bai and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. D.D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
None for the land owners.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 3135 of 1999, titled State of Haryana and another Versus Amriti and others.
(RAJESH BINDAL) 21.09.2010 JUDGE sarita
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana and another Versus Amriti and othersReferred¶12
State of Haryana and another Versus Amriti and others
State of Haryana
Smt. Bhanwa Bai and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
