Ram Phal Dangi v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear despite notices dated 09.08.2010 and 27.08.2010; court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Petitioner failed to appear despite notices dated 09.08.2010 and 27.08.2010; court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 6252 of 1988 Date of Decision : October 01, 2010.
Shri Ram Phal Dange
...... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana and another
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH.
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. D.S. Nalwa, Addl. A.G. Haryana, for the respondents.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL).
Case has been called.
None had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 09.08.2010 and 27.08.2010 also. Even today non has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
(AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE
October 01, 2010. sjks.
Shri Ram Phal Dange
The State of Haryana
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court