Single judge dismissed criminal revision petition challenging acquittal of respondents (accused) by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, finding no illegality, irregularity or perversity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Revision No.2395 of 2003 Date of Decision 17.09.2010
Lal Singh
...... Petitioner
VERSUS
Narain @ Bandar and others
...... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: None for the petitioner and respondent Nos.1 to 7 Mr.J.S.Rattu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.8-State.
A.N.JINDAL, J:
Aggrieved against the judgment dated 08.09.2003, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, acquitting the respondents-accused (herein referred as 'the accused') of the charges framed against them, the petitioner-complainant has preferred this petition.
On scrutiny, the impugned judgment sans any illegality much
less irregularity or perversity, warranting interference by this Court. The findings returned by the trial Court stand affirmed.
No grounds to interfere.
Dismissed.
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
17.09.2010 mamta-II
Lal Singh
Narain @ Bandar and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
