Civil Writ Petition No.5532 of 1989 where the petitioner failed to appear in person or through counsel despite summons; the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.5532 of 1989 Date of Decision 18.11.2010
M/s Jagdamba Precision Products, 203, Subhash Nagar, Rohtak
...... Petitioner
VERSUS
The Director of Industries, Haryana, Chandigarh and another
...... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.J.S.Rattu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents-State.
A.N.JINDAL, J:
Despite several calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of
the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
18.11.2010
mamta-II
M/s Jagdamba Precision Products
The Director of Industries, Haryana
another
A.N. JINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
