Monika Rani v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Writ Petition withdrawn by counsel due to disputed questions of facts to pursue alternative civil remedy.
Civil Writ Petition withdrawn by counsel due to disputed questions of facts to pursue alternative civil remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.18323 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 10, 2010
Monika Rani
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Learned counsel wants to withdraw the petition, in view of disputed questions of facts that have arisen, so as to enable the petitioner to take alternate remedy including
remedy of filing civil suit.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
as prayed for.
(AJAI LAMBA)
August 10, 2010 JUDGE avin
Monika Rani
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court